Friday, June 07, 2002
GRADE INFLATION AT “THE DAILY DISH”
Andrew Sullivan, Easy “A”
When we were in school there were a few professors whose course load included one that earned the appellation “easy ‘A’.” The easy-A courses were highly sought after by aspiring business majors, the less academically inclined athletes, lazy fine arts majors, and first-semester seniors searching for a quick pre-graduate school application boost to their grade point averages.
The easy-A professors might have been known among the student body for their sense of humor, daft opinions, scatterbrained personality traits, but they were rarely, if ever, genuinely respected.
Which takes us to Andrew Sullivan.
Sullivan, who protests the label “toady,” had this to say about President George W. Bush’s address to the nation last night:
“THE SPEECH: A B grade, I’d say. He’s still awful at these stand-ups in front of the camera. The phrases were a little wooden; and no president should start talking about how federal agencies interact. On the bright side, Bush didn’t seem defensive or political (although he’s being both those things, of course); the plan seems a no-brainer to your average guy; he’s still likable and real. But this is the last Karen Hughes guided speech. If Andy Card’s deranged mutterings to Esquire are any guide to his political skills, it’s all downhill from here.”
A “B”? Only a Harvard graduate would inflate last night’s string of sentences -- a “D-minus” speech from a “C-minus” President -- into a “speech” earning a “B.”
Even the reliably partisan John Podhoretz “got” the speech. Here’s Podhoretz in today’s New York Post:
“Last night, the president laid a rhetorical egg. His nationally televised address on his proposed Department of Homeland Security was a stinker.
“It was so poor, in fact, that Democrats who believe Bush’s historic announcement was ginned up rapidly to wrest national attention away from yesterday’s flashy Senate hearings on intelligence failures might actually have a point….
“[H]e did almost nothing to explain why the creation of a massive new Cabinet department with authority over 170,000 people was so vitally important to the American people, to homeland security -- or even to him.
“The only specific new task he mentioned for the department was to produce a daily terrorist threat assessment for him -- and this came after he had just told us that he gets a daily terrorist threat assessment already….
“It was not a performance worthy of this president -- though as a political gambit to change the subject from the Senate hearings, it sure did do the trick.”
We find ourselves in odd agreement with Podhoretz, though we would add one more point.
What to do with Ridge
The President’s sudden support of a Cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security -- as recently as Tuesday he opposed the idea -- may also have been the result of pressure from former Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge, the current director of the office. In fact, we have a sneaking suspicion Ridge told President Bush he was thinking of walking, an outcome that would have caused the President a singificant loss of face.
Why would Ridge walk? First, out of boredom. The man took a job without an “in” box, one of the worst mistakes a politician can make. Without the authority to mobilize resources, plan policy, and prepare and administer a budget, Ridge had run out of busy work.
That leads to the second reason, status. Ridge, who certainly has further political aspirations, cannot have failed to recognize that his position -- what with the color-coded terrorist warnings (and less) -- undermined his prestige. Ridge undoubtedly worried about the creeping irrelevancy of the job.
We would hazard a bet that the less-than-flattering -- even embarrassing -- article in Monday’s Philadelphia Inquirer, “Ridge Struggles to Define His Role: As the status of his office sinks, he builds a base outside of D.C.,” may have been the spark Ridge needed to lobby the President for Cabinet-level status. Regardless, we continue to believe the position is a losing proposition. We predict Ridge will be gone within a year.
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|