Friday, June 07, 2002
“MOTHER OF ALL CHICK FLICKS”
Ya-Ya This
“Mother of All Chick Flicks.”
Yes, that’s what we were thinking, but we weren’t about to say that and the words are not ours. They come from Katrina Onstad, reviewing the new film, “Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood,” in today’s edition of the National Post.
Reviews of the film, which opens tonight, have been largely negative:
New York Times, Stephen Holden: “This big, blowzy movie, which opens today nationwide, is more concerned with sustaining a mood of cute chin-up sentimentality than with connecting its dramatic dots….For all its failed connections, ‘Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood’ is nurturing, in a gauzy, dithering way. Its upbeat attitude could be summed up in the title of another recent sudsfest cut from the same sopping piece of fabric: hope floats.”
Philadelphia Inquirer, Carrie Rickey: “Less successful in exploring the long-term effects of mental breakdown than in dispensing short-term comic pick-me-ups, ‘Ya-Ya’ wrings abundant laughter and tears.”
Chicago Tribune, Michael Wilmington: “It’s a likable movie with a great cast, and for about a half-hour or so, I was in its corner….But ‘Divine Secrets’ begins to lose its grip about halfway through, and it winds up closer to a second-string ‘Steel Magnolias’ or ‘Fried Green Tomatoes’ than anything by Tennessee Williams or [Eudora] Welty.” [Ed.: Our expectations weren’t that high.]
Salon.com, Stephanie Zacharek: Director Callie Khouri has an “agenda, which is to craft a facsimile of a real Southern family story but to make sure that we don’t miss the message: Women must stick together, through thick and thin. Women are strong. Southern women in particular, because of their sass and liveliness, can get away with a lot more bad behavior than the rest of us boring old folk, and it’s all OK. It all adds up to something heavily calculated to make us feel good. But it’s really just a beignet that doesn’t sit right.”
We’re not surprised. We have two firm rules that have served us well over the years:
1. No matter how tempting the film may appear, never pay to see a movie that is promoted with trailers that include a scene of three or more women sharing a bonding moment in their underwear. (See also “Practical Magic.”)
2. Avoid films and shows that are better known by abbreviated nicknames than their proper names. (I.e., “Ya-Ya” rather than “Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood.” See also “Angels in America.”)
Our rules have been validated once again. We’re staying home.
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|