Thursday, December 04, 2003
SULLIVAN SHOCKS COLGATE COMMUNITY
College Students Reeling in Amazement, Speaker Says of Own Words
Andrew Sullivan today writes, in a post headed “Reagan and AIDS,” a brief note that on the subject of AIDS and, well, everything else, is remarkably tendentious, misleading, and anti-historical, even for him:
Tuesday night, at Colgate University, the one point I made that truly shocked the audience was a defense of the drug companies.
Shocked as in, “They were surprised.”? Or shocked as in, “They were shocked. Shocked!”?
I hope it’s the latter, otherwise I’ll be forced to conclude that Colgate, which was considered a pretty good school back in my day, has experienced a precipitous decline in the intellectual capacity and general awareness of its student body.
I would have thought at least a handful of Colgate students would be vaguely familiar with Sullivan’s long history of parroting the pharmaceutical industry’s party line and his rich association with its financial largesse.
The same might be said as well for Colgate’s faculty, though being academicians and therefore inevitably inveterate left-wing America-haters they probably stayed away in droves. (Except maybe that weird guy from the physics department or somewhere -- you know, the guy with the thing about the holocaust or African-Americans’ genes or whatever, it’s almost always something outside his field of expertise -- because every campus has at least one of those guys, and they show up for everything. And then they hog the speaker’s time afterward and then sometimes the speaker invites them to submit an article or something. And, incredibly, sometimes the speaker actually publishes the stuff.)
Then again, Sullivan’s public profile isn’t what it was (and in more ways than one from what I understand).
Thus I’m inclined to think the Big Tuesday Night Shocker in Hamilton, such as it might have been, occurred because Colgate students are spending more time reading the New York Times than the “Daily Dish,” that long-since gone-over-the-edge collection of predictable Sullivanisms that so many bored web surfers turn to when they’re all ticked off that “Dilbert” just “isn’t as funny as it used to be.”
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|