Saturday, January 03, 2004
A READER WRITES
About Credit-Card Interest
“Huh?”
In a previous post here I linked to an item, “100 Things About Me,” that I published in October 2002 at my second blog, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse.
A reader who traveled to TRR to peruse the list writes:
Huh? What’s the deal with number 24? “I believe credit-card interest should be deductible again.” When was it ever? What’s up with that? How can we get in on it?
Ah, youth.
The reader is obviously not in a position to recall that Congress and former President Ronald W. Reagan (R) eliminated the deductibility of credit-card interest through the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
I never understood the logic behind this measure, other than the drive to reduce the massive deficits caused by the Reagan administration’s insane fiscal and economic policies. There was at the time, however, much resentful grumbling among middle-aged and older Americans about the purportedly irresponsible spending habits of Baby Boomers and “yuppies” (yes, from the Reagan White House), the same bitter thinking that appears to underlie the current tax code’s mistreatment of single people.
Anyway, as it happens, 1986 was the year I entered the workforce. I soon accumulated what, at the time, seemed to be an unbearably onerous debt load of $1,000. Ha. There’s been no looking back since.
I once asked esteemed economists and fellow bloggers Max Sawicky and Brad DeLong about this matter but, I’m embarrassed to say, I can no longer remember their answers.
We’ll have to ask them. Regardless of what they say -- in other words, even if we are dismayed by their responses -- their word must be respected, for despite their occupation they are gentlemen.
Perhaps they can explain why this tax benefit -- which, if restored, would represent real and genuine and meaningful tax relief to millions of middle- and working-class Americans -- was stolen from us and why nobody in the past 17 years even has thought about restoring it.
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|