Monday, March 07, 2005
I RESEMBLE THAT REMARK ARTICLE
Getting “Phished” Hurts Like Hell
In today’s New York Times, we read in “On EBay, E-Mail Phishers Find a Well-Stocked Pond,” by Ian Austen:
Donald Jay Alofs got a call last fall at home asking if he had recently bought several thousand dollars worth of electronics. Mr. Alofs had not, and he had a good reason for not being on a spending spree: he was in the hospital at the time.
Things got worse for Mr. Alofs, a coin collector and dealer who buys and sells on eBay. His inbox was soon filled with e-mail messages from irate buyers: someone had used his eBay account to sell about $780,000 worth of coins -- about five times the online business Mr. Alofs had done over several years -- and many of the coins offered for sale never existed.
Adding insult to injury, fees for hosting photos for the fraudulent auctions had been financed with $300 from Mr. Alofs’s account with PayPal, eBay's online payment service.
The source of the trouble, he believes, was that his eBay and PayPal accounts were hijacked through what is known as phishing, a type of online fraud that collects victims’ account passwords and other information, after he responded to an e-mail that appeared to come from a legitimate business.
I can relate. I can relate to Alofs’s predicament because the exact same thing has happened to me. Twice. Twice within the last three months.
Because of the “phishing” to which the Times’s article about Austen refers, my checking account, which currently should carry an available balance in the (incredibly unimpressive) low three figures, i.e, about 300 dollars, currently “shows,” or in the prevailing position of my bank, which shall remain nameless, “demonstrates,” me to be overdrawn by more than $3,000.
As a result, I cannot access or use my account in any way.
I cannot deposit funds into my account nor can I withdraw funds through any conceivable means whatsoever.
I cannot open a new account at my current bank, and have been advised that most other depositaries, at least those who might contact the “current” location of my scanty funds, will view my application therefor with considerable hestitancy.
And I no longer can accept or receive donations from Rittenhouse readers through a PayPal “tip box,” the means of donation by which many bloggers earn or supplement their income.
And if you think my bank, let alone PayPal, makes it easy to resolve such situation, think again.
I am a man without a checking account, and in this economy, that makes me no man at all.
| HOME |
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
 |
 |
CONTACT |
 |
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
 |
BIO & STUFF |
 |
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
 |
PUBLICATION NOTES |
 |
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
 |
|
LINKS |
 |
|
 |
|