Thursday, June 19, 2003
BLOGGING, BUSY SCHEDULES, AND PROCRASTINATING
Take It Away, Teresa Nielsen Hayden
One of the things I like best about blogging is that it enables a writer to hold forth on any subject he wishes. The limits, at least in my opinion, are determined only by ensuring that one’s blog displays at least some sense of coherency, some degree of logical connection among themes, and some element of intelligent discourse.
Better yet, though, is that when a blogger feels passionately about a particular subject but is hampered by a busy schedule, procrastination, or that perennial bugaboo, writer’s block (about which be sure to see “Breaking Through Writer’s Block,” by John Warner, at McSweeney’s, for which I thank Professor Pinkerton), more often than not there’s a blogger already filling the void with an essay far better than that working its way through your head on the check-out line.
Such is the case this week with the subject of the damage done to the Iraqi National Museum of Antiquities, a subject about which I am unabashedly passionate. I’ve written about the issue in the past, and what with new reports contradicting earlier news of rampant looting of the museum’s most treasured artifacts and the gleeful warmongers happily discounting the tally of priceless stolen vases, cuneiform tablets, and other items, I wanted to weigh in again.
But my blogs are not my life, and the post I started never really got anywhere. I’m grateful, then, as we all should be, to Teresa Nielsen Hayden of Making Light, who, as several other bloggers already have observed, has written what can only be described as the most authoritative and convincing summation of the controversy I have seen anywhere.
Though pleased the most dire of reports of damage at the museum were overstated, Nielsen Hayden persuasively argues that what occurred in Baghdad was nonetheless a cultural tragedy and that the philistines who would have us return blissfully to our Barcaloungers are not only misguided, but ignorant.
Properly, but to a lesser extent than I would have done, Nielsen Hayden alludes to the ethnocentrism of those who would downplay the seriousness of the damage. What does Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld care about ancient vases in pristine condition? Precious little, as his public comments have revealed. It’s a shame, a disgrace really, that he paid no mind to the archaeologists who before the war pleaded with the Pentagon to take such matters into even the slightest of consideration.
“Why do they hate us?” is a popular meme on the right these days. Well, I don’t hate us, but I certainly hate giving “them” so many reasons to do so.
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|