Monday, July 07, 2003
THE DEVIL & MISS WINTOUR
Selling One’s Soul in Times Square
Over the weekend, looking at the New York Times best sellers lists, I noticed first, that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s book, Living History, ranks above Ann Coulter’s Treason on the hardcover non-fiction list, and second, that The Devil Wears Prada, by Lauren Weisberger, ranks sixth on the hardcover fiction list.
A link directed Times readers to the paper’s review of Weisberger’s book, a roman à clef about her tenure as Vogue editor Anna Wintour’s assistant, that I missed back in April.
The Times’s idea of an appropriate reviewer? Kate Betts.
Incredible.
Granted, Betts and the Times had the decency to provide this much-needed disclaimer for the benefit of readers not already aware: “Having worked at Vogue myself for eight years and having been mentored by Anna Wintour, I have to say Weisberger could have learned a few things in the year she sold her soul to the devil of fashion for $32,500.”
But as Caitlin Flanagan put it in the latest issue of The Atlantic, in a review I noticed the same evening, “Was Wintour herself unavailable to write the review?”
[Post-publication addendum (July 9): On this subject see also Jennifer Weiner’s comments at SnarkSpot. It turns out Betts wasn’t the only person to review the book for the Times. Janet Maslin was given a go at it as well. Excerpts from SnarkSpot: “But the Times makes TDWP sound something like magazine publishing's version of The Satanic Verses. Its two reviews didn't quite call for a fatwa, but they did wind up calling Weisberger (and her narrator) a self-absorbed, righteous, stuck-up little snob who had no business writing a book. . . . As a New York City outsider, I’m mystified. If the book was that darn mediocre (and, in the interests of full disclosure, I should say that I haven’t read it yet), why even bother to review it once, let alone pan it twice? It’s especially strange, given that neither reviewer even attempted to mount a defense of Ms. Wintour, or to suggest that she’d been treated unfairly.”]
[Post-publication addendum (July 9): I blogged about Wintour’s pre-launch p.r. campaign back in February: “Anna Wintour Goes in for a Makeover.”]
[Post-publication addendum (July 10): Tapped, the weblog of the American Prospect, at the time noted the strange assignment of Betts to Weinberger’s book. Thanks to Hesiod of CounterSpin Central for sending along the link.]
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|