Sunday, October 17, 2004
GETTING IT WRONG AT THE INQUIRER . . . AGAIN
Philadelphia Paper Endorses Specter
The Sunday Philadelphia Inquirer is often a disappointment. More than half the bulk is comprised of advertisements in one form or another and of what remains, too much is recycled from the Associated Press or borrowed from other newspapers. (Question: What would happen to the Inquirer if the A.P. feed went down?) Trust me, it's not like sitting down with the Times.
Today's edition was particularly disappointing, as the editors wasted paper and ink to publish "Reelect Specter," an endorsement of the reelection campaign of the senior senator from Pennsylvania.
(The Philadelphia Daily News took a smarter tack, endorsing Rep. Joe Hoeffel on October 4, just another reason to be happy to live in one the country's dwindling number of two-newspaper towns.)
Granted, the Inquirer enthusiastically endorsed John F. Kerry for president -- "urgent, deeply felt," they said. The editors went so far as to simultaneously launch a 21-day series of editorials supporting Kerry's candidacy heading toward Election Day, a gutsy move for which they deserve credit. (You will not be surprised to learn the Inquirer has taken considerable heat from a segment of its readers crying "foul": nasty e-mails, cancelled subscriptions, etc., etc.)
And, as unsettling as the endorsement is, the editors' nod in Sen. Specter's direction was hardly enthusiastic, relied heavily on a single issue, namely abortion, and took full notice of the senator's slippery slope of substanceless stances:
This endorsement does not take lightly Specter's tendency to run to the right as he gears up for reelection. He did so this year to overcome a formidable challenge in the Republican primary from conservative Rep. Pat Toomey. Casting himself as a Republican with an independent streak, Specter was a reliable vote for President Bush on issues ranging from tax cuts, to the invasion of Iraq, to drilling for oil in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Hoeffel is correct that Specter's votes for the Bush tax cuts helped worsen the deficit. In his next term, Specter, 74, must take more seriously the need to end government borrowing. That moderate streak ought to show up more often in the new year.
Faint praise, that.
| HOME |
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|