Friday, December 31, 2004
JOHN PODHORETZ IS SO WRONG
Crankiness Runs in the Family
New York Post columnist John Podhoretz, known around these parts as Podhoretz the Lesser, is all a-crank because everybody’s picking on President Four-Day Delay.
In today’s paper Podhoretz offers a few doodlings about the Sumatra earthquake and tsunami (“It’s About the Tragedy -- Not More Bush-Bashing”):
[A]t this moment, the United States is not the issue.
The foreign-aid budget of the United States is not the issue.
Our government should not be the focal point of the discussion right now.
These paragraphs include the beginnings of thoughts that, if expanded by a larger mind, might be defensible, but then Podhoretz goes haywire:
Don’t we owe the dead, dying[,] and injured the minimal grace not to convert their suffering into a chat-show segment -- the latest left-right clash over the Bush presidency?
The “left-right clash” to which the Lesser refers consists, of course, in the left exploiting “this cataclysm as little more than cheap debate fodder about the nature and character of the United States, its president and its citizens.” And a Bush supporter cannot honestly whine about “the clash” when the president sends his little brother on such a critical mission.
From there it’s just a quick step into righteous indignation and ignorance:
Development aid is the blanket term for American grant money handed out to other countries, supposedly to help their economies grow. Development aid has nothing -- nothing -- to do with what has happened.
The aid at issue now is disaster relief.
These statements are so patently and astonishingly untrue it’s difficult to imagine how it made its way into print. Oh, wait, we’re talking about the Post.
Granted, the earthquake and subsequent tsunami did not result from development aid or the paucity thereof, but the extent of the destruction has everything to do with the region’s underdeveloped status. To cite only a few factors: Flimsy housing, large segments of the population crowded in squalid conditions in low-lying coastal areas, primitive livelihoods so easily shattered, inadequate infrastructure, and, apparently, no warning system.
“Disaster relief” barely begins to describe the efforts ahead in the most-affected countries. Before long the focus will have moved on to disease prevention and containment (at best), and after that to reconstruction of the devastated areas.
Reconstruction. That sounds an awful lot like development to me. To Podhoretz I’m sure it sounds like fighting words.
| HOME |
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|