Sunday, January 16, 2005
DOES ARMSTRONG WILLIAMS SPEAK THE TRUTH?
A Language Only Conservatives Understand?
Ever since Williams/Paige-Gate erupted last week I’ve wondered how many right-wing and Republican bloggers not otherwise feasting on the vast conspiracy’s well funded gravy train were on the take. Then, after David Corn of The Nation got Armstrong Williams, the 240-thousand-dollar-man, on the record saying “There are others,” I couldn’t wait for the inevitable fallout, though I suspected it would take some time.
Well, it’s already begun. Actually, Ben Hanten of Dirty Flower wrote about this more than a month ago, not that anyone cared.
According to Hanten, Senator-elect John Thune (R-S.D.) “paid $27,000 to Jon Lauck of the Daschle v. Thune blog for five months work. Jason Van Beek of South Dakota Politics was paid $8,000 for the same period. (Thune defeated incumbent Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle in the November election.)
There’s more:
This is insane. Nowhere on Daschle v. Thune was there a disclaimer that he was being paid $5,200 per month by a candidate. It brings Lauck’s entire credibility into question. As a state employee (instructor at SDSU [Ed.: South Dakota State University]) he is already pushing the limits ([former Gov. Bill] Janklow would never have allowed a liberal prof[essor] to publish [his/her] views). [Ed.: Emphasis in original.]
Van Beek’s $8,000 is no chump change either. These guys spent every day attacking Daschle and promoting the “Rock Star” Thune. They had perfect timing on issues like the last minute Daschle lawsuit. How could they have known? Because Dick Wadhams had hired them! [Ed.: Wadhams was Thune’s campaign manager.] Lauck admitted that he had access to information he wouldn’t have [had] otherwise.
Daschle v. Thune and South Dakota Politics were and forever will be paid advertisements by John Thune. And . . . now the two have joined forces. Lauck has quit his blog and joined Van Beek’s.
All materials paid for by a campaign need to have a disclaimer saying so. They deceived their readers. These guys sold their names and tarnished what little reputation and credibility bloggers have. Who can blame them for that kind of money?
Not me. Frankly, I wouldn’t mind a retainer like that secured by Daschle v. Thune, but I assure you that had I landed such a contract I would have told you about it. And I wouldn’t have spent the last 12 months subsisting on pasta and ramen.
(Thanks to Vaara of Silt 3.0 for the link.)
| HOME |
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|