Sunday, January 16, 2005
MISERABLE FAILURE
Blogging Isn’t For Everyone and . . .
Not Everyone is a Blogger Waiting to Happen
Oh my God. I’m not sure what’s appropriate here: pity or mockery. I’ll go with the latter.
James Howard Gibbons, who fortunately for all Houstonians carries around the rather humiliating title of “interim editor” of the Houston Chronicle’s opinion pages, today had published a little piece entitled “Notes on Blogs,” in which he scribbled, among almost nothing else, the following:
Web logs [sic], or blogs, are the hot new medium for commentary. So many have sprung up that one can only tend to a narrow selection or a digest of highlights.
I have sampled a few blogs, but enjoyed fewer. Though reluctant to do anyone an injustice, I find that most blogs lack the elegance, wit[,] and insight one looks for in magazine commentary and editorial pages in their ideal state.
“Ideal state.” That’s a nice touch. Where does the “ideal state” exist, if anywhere at all? And in which American newspaper’s editorial pages does one consistently, or even occasionally, find elegance, wit, and insight? The Chronicle? Please.
Gibbons surely is looking for good blogging in all the wrong places. Why do I feel justified in suspecting the interim editor limited his blog skimming to such overrated sites as the Daily Dish, Instapundit, and Kausfiles, the persistently dull and self-referential triumvirate that constitutes the “research” of every lazy, oblivious newspaper or magazine reporter who attempts to explain the blogosphere, a space in which they are neither welcome nor particularly well suited.
To make matters worse -- for himself -- Gibbons, having disdainfully dished the weblog genre writ large, then had the audacity to try his hand at blogging.
How clever of Gibbons to “prove” weblogs aren’t worth anyone’s time by offering as an allegedly prototypical example of blogging three trite and thoroughly uninteresting items (Halliburton, the Bible and the Harris County Courthouse, and something about the state budget), with not a single link embedded therein, nor even a whiff of the highly valued traits of elegance, wit, or insight.
Go take a look if you must, but let me assure you, it’s a veritable tragedy, and Gibbons is a miserable failure.
[Post-publication addendum: Charles Kuffner of Off the Kuff is at least equally shocked by the Chronicle’s stunning lapse in interim editorial judgment, and offers links to other bloggers’ comments on Gibbons’s embarrassing slobber.]
| HOME |
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|