Thursday, March 10, 2005
ARMOR IN THE NEWS
The Times Takes Note
Sen. Dodd Raises Questions
Where's My Reimbursement?
In an important article, "Many Missteps Tied to Delay in Armor for Troops in Iraq," by Michael Moss, published in the New York Times on March 7, the nation's paper of record took note of the abysmal failure of the Department of Defense and the armed services to supply American troops, particularly members of the Reserves and National Guard, with sufficient and appropriate vehicular and body armor.
Hmm . . . Sounds familiar, doesn't it? I'm sure it does to Rittenhouse readers who kept up with this site's harping and carping on behalf of the 427th Transportation Co., based in nearby Norristown, Pa.
I say, Welcome to the issue, my friends on West 43rd Street.
And in a brief item in today's Philadelphia Daily News "Senator's Gripe: Pentagon Not Reimbursing for Armor," we read:
The Defense Department hasn't developed a plan to reimburse soldiers for equipment they've bought to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan despite requirements in a law passed last year, a senator says.
In a letter yesterday to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., asked details on the Pentagon's progress on the reimbursement program and questioned why
it was not done yet.
"It's pretty outrageous when you have all their rhetoric about how much we care about our people in uniform," Dodd said.
Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke said Rumsfeld will respond to Dodd's letter after he has reviewed it. She had no comment on the progress of reimbursement regulations.
Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I am compelled to reveal that I have a dog in this hunt, as they say. At least sort of.
While reading that the Department of Defense "hasn't developed a plan to reimburse soldiers for equipment they've bought," I can't help but ask whether there exists a plan to reimburse civilians like myself who facilitated the shipment from the U.S. to the Iraqi war arena of "surplus" armor from retired domestic peace officers?
And, more important, are there any plans to reimburse those very men and women who sent their own protection to soldiers overseas based on the pleas I made on behalf of the 427th?
I'm just asking is all.
Looks like it's time to start working the phones again, readers.
[See also "Plan to Reimburse Private Costs for Combat Gear Falls Behind," by John Files, the New York Times, March 10.]
| HOME |
The Rittenhouse Review |
Copyright 2002-2006 | PERMALINK |
|
|
|
CONTACT |
|
Send E-Mail
JAMES MARTIN CAPOZZOLA
|
|
BIO & STUFF |
|
James Martin (Jim) Capozzola launched The Rittenhouse Review in April 2002, TRR: The Lighter Side of Rittenhouse, HorowitzWatch, and Smarter Andrew Sullivan in July 2002, and Bulldogs for Kerry-Edwards in October 2004. He is also a contributing member of President Boxer.
He received the 2002 Koufax Award for Best Post> for "Al Gore and the Alpha Girls" (published November 25, 2002). Capozzola's record in the Koufax Awards includes two additional nominations for 2002 (Best Blog and Best Writing), three nominations for 2003 (Best Blog, Best Series, and Best Writing), and two finalist nominations in 2004 (Best Blog and Best Writing).
Capozzola’s experience beyond the blogosphere includes a lengthy career in financial journalism, securities analysis, and investment research, and in freelance writing, editing, ghost-writing, and writing instruction.
He earned his bachelor's degree in political science from the University at Albany and a master's in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia.
Capozzola lives in Philadelphia with his bulldog, Mildred.
|
PUBLICATION NOTES |
|
Posts pertaining to site developments, news, and updates are subject to deletion and to withdrawal, and with respect thereto, without notice.
~~~~~
Access to linked articles may require registration or subscription.
~~~~~
Linked articles are subject to expiration at the sole discretion of the original publisher.
~~~~~
Letters received by The Rittenhouse Review are subject to publication in full and with complete citation and attribution, including the sender's mailing and/or e-mail address and/or addresses, unless otherwise specifically requested in writing and at the time of submission.
~~~~~
The publisher reserves the right to confirm the identity and/or identities of each, any, and all correspondents through and by whatever means legal and necessary.
~~~~~
Any and all correspondence received and published hereat is subject to editing by the publisher for content, particularly but with no limitations implied thereto, with respect to vulgarity and other offensive language, and length, at the complete, full, and unhindered discretion of same.
~~~~~
The decision to publish each or any correspondence, if at all, rests solely with the publisher of this site.
~~~~~
The publisher retains copyrights to all original material here published and any submissions here received, including correspondence directed hereto, whether or not published hereat, unless otherwise specified.
~~~~~
Obviously, no provision is here made for immediate comments from readers.
~~~~~
All rights reserved and all that.
|
|
|
LINKS |
|
|
|
|